Vance says US has economic and military ‘tools of leverage’ if Russia doesn’t push for peace with Ukraine, WSJ reports
บอกแว้ว อะไรๆในยุคตั๊มนั้นมันไบโพล่าห์ อย่าดีจัยไปก่อนเด้
หลังจากเฮกเซ่น ออกมาทิ้งบอมใส่ NATO-EU ให้ชาวรุสเงิบสารขัณท์ดีจัย
จนดาหน้ากันออกมาตั้งกระทู้แบบกลัวไครไม่รู้นั้น
ล่าสุดคนที่ใหญ่กว่าอย่าง แว๊นซ์ๆ ออกมาแถ-ลง กลับว่า
เฮ่ยอย่าดีจัยไป เพราะถ้าผลการเจรจาไม่เป็นที่น่าพอจัย
เลาพร้อมจะใช้เครื่องมือทางเสดตะกิดและการทหารบีบ Egg หมีปู๊ว์ทุกเมื่อ
และเรื่องทหารเมกาบิดาทุกถาบันก็ไม่อยากยุ่ง ก้ไม่ไดั๊ยอยากยุงอ่ะแหละ
แต่ถ้าจำเป็น แฟ๊มมันรอเซ็นต์อยู่บนโต๊ะตั๊มแล้วนะจุ๊บๆ
ด้วยเหตุทั้งหมดทั้งมวล นำสู่ศาสตร์การเมืองระดับประเทศแบบฟันหัวพวกมุงว่า
ไปขึ้นสังเวียนนั่งต่อยปากคุยกันเดๆ แบบพรี่ได้ทุกดอกนะ
เล่าข่าวเกรียนๆอีกแล้ว โดยอีแร๊งส์ เม๊พเมพขริงๆ
https://www.yahoo.com/news/us-could-send-troops-ukraine-060532272.html
Vice President JD Vance warned on Thursday that the United States could hit Russia with economic and military “tools of leverage” if Russian leader Vladimir Putin doesn’t negotiate a peace deal with Ukraine in good faith.
Speaking to the Wall Street Journal on Thursday, Vance said the option of sending US troops to Ukraine was “on the table,” as well as economic punishment if a peace deal doesn’t guarantee Kyiv’s long-term independence.
“There are economic tools of leverage, there are of course military tools of leverage,” Vance told the newspaper.
His comments strike a different tone from other recent statements from the White House – including from US President Donald Trump who suggested this week that Ukraine “may be Russian someday,” shortly before announcing that peace negotiations would begin immediately after holding a phone call with Putin.
Vance’s statement also contrasts with Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, who has said the US would no longer prioritize European and Ukrainian security. This week, he told NATO allies that European and non-European troops – but not Americans – would have to police any agreement between Ukraine and Russia.
The Wall Street Journal interview was published before Vance was set to meet with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky at the high-level Munich Security Conference in Germany.
On arrival in Munich Vance said NATO remains an important alliance for the United States.
“Europe is of course a very important ally to the United States, NATO is a very important military alliance … but we want to make sure NATO is actually built for the future, and part of that is ensuring that NATO does a little bit more burden-sharing in Europe so the United States can focus on some of our challenges in East Asia,” Vance said, speaking to reporters beside NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte.
An air of uncertainty and anxiety that has enveloped Europe in the past week, after Trump’s announcement sparked fears that a “dirty deal” may be struck with Putin to end the war on terms favorable to Moscow without Kyiv’s involvement.
Many in Europe were shocked Trump appeared to make key concessions to Moscow before even agreeing to peace talks. His and Hegseth’s comments also threw into question the future of NATO’s future unity, resources and funding, a cornerstone of European security since the Second World War.
There was also surprise that Trump spoke to Putin before speaking to Zelensky, with European leaders on Thursday scrambling to make clear any peace deal would have to involve Ukraine at the heart of negotiations.
After Trump’s announcement of the peace deal negotiations, French President Emmanuel Macron also described his return to the White House as an “electroshock” for Europe in an interview with the Financial Times.
Macron underlined the need for Europe to strengthen its economy and defenses, agreeing with Trump’s stance that Ukraine’s security was a European responsibility. But he also emphasized that only Ukraine could negotiate for itself, and that any peace that was a “capitulation” would be bad news for everyone.
อะไรๆ ก็ไม่แน้นนวน รอง ปธน แว๊นซ์. ออกมาแถ-ลง ว่า เฮ่ยอย่าดีจัยไป ถ้าการเจราไม่เป็นที่น่าพอจัยเลาพร้อมกดดันนะจ๊ะหมีปู๊ว์
บอกแว้ว อะไรๆในยุคตั๊มนั้นมันไบโพล่าห์ อย่าดีจัยไปก่อนเด้
หลังจากเฮกเซ่น ออกมาทิ้งบอมใส่ NATO-EU ให้ชาวรุสเงิบสารขัณท์ดีจัย
จนดาหน้ากันออกมาตั้งกระทู้แบบกลัวไครไม่รู้นั้น
ล่าสุดคนที่ใหญ่กว่าอย่าง แว๊นซ์ๆ ออกมาแถ-ลง กลับว่า
เฮ่ยอย่าดีจัยไป เพราะถ้าผลการเจรจาไม่เป็นที่น่าพอจัย
เลาพร้อมจะใช้เครื่องมือทางเสดตะกิดและการทหารบีบ Egg หมีปู๊ว์ทุกเมื่อ
และเรื่องทหารเมกาบิดาทุกถาบันก็ไม่อยากยุ่ง ก้ไม่ไดั๊ยอยากยุงอ่ะแหละ
แต่ถ้าจำเป็น แฟ๊มมันรอเซ็นต์อยู่บนโต๊ะตั๊มแล้วนะจุ๊บๆ
ด้วยเหตุทั้งหมดทั้งมวล นำสู่ศาสตร์การเมืองระดับประเทศแบบฟันหัวพวกมุงว่า
ไปขึ้นสังเวียนนั่งต่อยปากคุยกันเดๆ แบบพรี่ได้ทุกดอกนะ
เล่าข่าวเกรียนๆอีกแล้ว โดยอีแร๊งส์ เม๊พเมพขริงๆ
https://www.yahoo.com/news/us-could-send-troops-ukraine-060532272.html
Vice President JD Vance warned on Thursday that the United States could hit Russia with economic and military “tools of leverage” if Russian leader Vladimir Putin doesn’t negotiate a peace deal with Ukraine in good faith.
Speaking to the Wall Street Journal on Thursday, Vance said the option of sending US troops to Ukraine was “on the table,” as well as economic punishment if a peace deal doesn’t guarantee Kyiv’s long-term independence.
“There are economic tools of leverage, there are of course military tools of leverage,” Vance told the newspaper.
His comments strike a different tone from other recent statements from the White House – including from US President Donald Trump who suggested this week that Ukraine “may be Russian someday,” shortly before announcing that peace negotiations would begin immediately after holding a phone call with Putin.
Vance’s statement also contrasts with Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, who has said the US would no longer prioritize European and Ukrainian security. This week, he told NATO allies that European and non-European troops – but not Americans – would have to police any agreement between Ukraine and Russia.
The Wall Street Journal interview was published before Vance was set to meet with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky at the high-level Munich Security Conference in Germany.
On arrival in Munich Vance said NATO remains an important alliance for the United States.
“Europe is of course a very important ally to the United States, NATO is a very important military alliance … but we want to make sure NATO is actually built for the future, and part of that is ensuring that NATO does a little bit more burden-sharing in Europe so the United States can focus on some of our challenges in East Asia,” Vance said, speaking to reporters beside NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte.
An air of uncertainty and anxiety that has enveloped Europe in the past week, after Trump’s announcement sparked fears that a “dirty deal” may be struck with Putin to end the war on terms favorable to Moscow without Kyiv’s involvement.
Many in Europe were shocked Trump appeared to make key concessions to Moscow before even agreeing to peace talks. His and Hegseth’s comments also threw into question the future of NATO’s future unity, resources and funding, a cornerstone of European security since the Second World War.
There was also surprise that Trump spoke to Putin before speaking to Zelensky, with European leaders on Thursday scrambling to make clear any peace deal would have to involve Ukraine at the heart of negotiations.
After Trump’s announcement of the peace deal negotiations, French President Emmanuel Macron also described his return to the White House as an “electroshock” for Europe in an interview with the Financial Times.
Macron underlined the need for Europe to strengthen its economy and defenses, agreeing with Trump’s stance that Ukraine’s security was a European responsibility. But he also emphasized that only Ukraine could negotiate for itself, and that any peace that was a “capitulation” would be bad news for everyone.