คำตอบที่ได้รับเลือกจากเจ้าของกระทู้
ความคิดเห็นที่ 2
ถอดออกมาให้ครับ
- The Dhami Law Firm, P.C.
Arbitration Award
In Re: BTC-71386
{ } the Creditor(s)/Plaintiff(s)
vs.
{ Sedachev Anton Alexandrovich } the Debtor/Defendant
On this 22nd day of July, 2017 before Arbitrator Sukhman Dhami, a duly appointed
arbitrator under the Rules and Terms of Use set out by BTCjam (available at
www.BTCjam.com), the peer-to-peer lending website which facilitated the now disputed
Bitcoin loan, appeared the matter at bar, and having reviewed the evidence presented by
the participating Parties and BTCjam, and being otherwise advised, FINDS:
1."Bitcoin" is a worldwide, decentralized unit of digital currency being used in over 100,000
transactions daily. The market value of a bitcoin fluctuates in relation to the official
currency of any particular nation. http://www.coindesk.com/price/ is a reliable resource for
bitcoin valuation.
2.Binding arbitration is a form of alternative dispute resolution by which the Parties have
an enforceable right, rather than using litigation in the country of the Debtor’s domicile, to
protect their rights and interests, and such enforcement and protection rights were and are
part of the consideration for the Parties to use BTCjam as their peer-to-peer lending
platform for the exchange of Bitcoins across international boundaries.
3.By using the BTCjam platform, the Parties were/are bound by its terms, including use of
binding arbitration by The Dhami Law Firm, a neutral third-party arbitration service
separately paid by BTCjam for its arbitration services as part of the Terms of Use for the
Parties using BTCjam.
4.No Party at anytime objected to the use of The Dhami Law Firm for resolving disputes
arising under the Terms of Agreement.
5.No Party at anytime disputed or accused The Dhami Law Firm of partiality or
incompetence. Neither the arbitrator nor The Dhami Law Firm had any personal
knowledge of this claim before it was presented or any relationship to any Party to this
claim. - etc.
พ่อคุณพ่อทูนหัว ข้อความแนวกฏหมายทำนองแนวฟ้องร้องอะไรระดับนี้
ให้ผู้เชี่ยวเขาแปลเหอะ เตรียมแบ็งค์เทาไว้สัก 2-3 ใบไว้สำหรับต่อหนึ่งหน้าเลย
หากอยากจะพอทำเนา เอาแค่รู้เรื่อง ก็ พึ่ง กูเกิน เลย
- The Dhami Law Firm, P.C.
Arbitration Award
In Re: BTC-71386
{ } the Creditor(s)/Plaintiff(s)
vs.
{ Sedachev Anton Alexandrovich } the Debtor/Defendant
On this 22nd day of July, 2017 before Arbitrator Sukhman Dhami, a duly appointed
arbitrator under the Rules and Terms of Use set out by BTCjam (available at
www.BTCjam.com), the peer-to-peer lending website which facilitated the now disputed
Bitcoin loan, appeared the matter at bar, and having reviewed the evidence presented by
the participating Parties and BTCjam, and being otherwise advised, FINDS:
1."Bitcoin" is a worldwide, decentralized unit of digital currency being used in over 100,000
transactions daily. The market value of a bitcoin fluctuates in relation to the official
currency of any particular nation. http://www.coindesk.com/price/ is a reliable resource for
bitcoin valuation.
2.Binding arbitration is a form of alternative dispute resolution by which the Parties have
an enforceable right, rather than using litigation in the country of the Debtor’s domicile, to
protect their rights and interests, and such enforcement and protection rights were and are
part of the consideration for the Parties to use BTCjam as their peer-to-peer lending
platform for the exchange of Bitcoins across international boundaries.
3.By using the BTCjam platform, the Parties were/are bound by its terms, including use of
binding arbitration by The Dhami Law Firm, a neutral third-party arbitration service
separately paid by BTCjam for its arbitration services as part of the Terms of Use for the
Parties using BTCjam.
4.No Party at anytime objected to the use of The Dhami Law Firm for resolving disputes
arising under the Terms of Agreement.
5.No Party at anytime disputed or accused The Dhami Law Firm of partiality or
incompetence. Neither the arbitrator nor The Dhami Law Firm had any personal
knowledge of this claim before it was presented or any relationship to any Party to this
claim. - etc.
พ่อคุณพ่อทูนหัว ข้อความแนวกฏหมายทำนองแนวฟ้องร้องอะไรระดับนี้
ให้ผู้เชี่ยวเขาแปลเหอะ เตรียมแบ็งค์เทาไว้สัก 2-3 ใบไว้สำหรับต่อหนึ่งหน้าเลย
หากอยากจะพอทำเนา เอาแค่รู้เรื่อง ก็ พึ่ง กูเกิน เลย
แสดงความคิดเห็น
ช่วยแปลเอกสารให้ด้วยครับ