Social Darwinism is a name given to various theories of society which emerged in the United Kingdom, North America, and Western Europe in the 1870s, and which claim to apply biological concepts of natural selection and survival of the fittest to sociology and politics.[1][2] According to their critics, at least, social Darwinists argue that the strong should see their wealth and power increase while the weak should see their wealth and power decrease. Different social-Darwinist groups have differing views about which groups of people are considered to be the strong and which groups of people are considered to be the weak, and they also hold different opinions about the precise mechanisms that should be used to reward strength and punish weakness. Many such views stress competition between individuals in laissez-faire capitalism, while others are claimed[by whom?] to have motivated ideas of authoritarianism, eugenics, racism, imperialism,[3] fascism, Nazism, and struggle between national or racial groups.[4][5]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_Darwinism


ทำไมรัฐต้องไปแทรกแซงมีกฎหมายไปจำกัดสิทธิของพลเมือง ทั้งทที่ในธรรมชาติสิ่งมีชีวิตก็วิวัฒนาการโดยใช้หลัก darwinism
มนุษย์ก็เป็นส่วนหนึ่งของธรรมชาติก็ควรจะใช้ social darwinism

ทฤษฎีของดาวินมาใช้ในสังคมเรียกว่าsocial darwinism ปลาใหญ่กินปลาเล็ก แข็งแกร่งดำรงอยู่ แล้วทำไมรัฐต้องไปแทรกแซง มีกฎหมาย
ทำไมไม่ปล่อยให้เป็นอิสระเสรี ?