We examine whether mutual funds change their names to take advantage of current
hot investment styles, and what effects these name changes have on inflows to the
funds, and to the funds' subsequent returns. We find that the year after a fund changes
its name to reflect a current hot style, the fund experiences an average cumulative
abnormal flow of 28%, with no improvement in performance. The increase in flows is
similar across funds whose holdings match the style implied by their new name and
those whose holdings do not, suggesting that investors are irrationally influenced by
cosmetic effects
เป็นบทคัดย่อค่ะ
ขอบคุณมากๆเลยค่ะ
ข้อความนี้แปลว่าอะไรค่ะ ใครใจดีแปลให้หน่อยนะๆๆค่ะ
hot investment styles, and what effects these name changes have on inflows to the
funds, and to the funds' subsequent returns. We find that the year after a fund changes
its name to reflect a current hot style, the fund experiences an average cumulative
abnormal flow of 28%, with no improvement in performance. The increase in flows is
similar across funds whose holdings match the style implied by their new name and
those whose holdings do not, suggesting that investors are irrationally influenced by
cosmetic effects
เป็นบทคัดย่อค่ะ
ขอบคุณมากๆเลยค่ะ