กระทู้นี้ผมมีความตั้งใจที่จะเสนอบทความ สำหรับให้ผู้อ่านที่เป็นพุทธศาสนิกชน ได้เข้าใจอย่างถูกต้องว่า อัลกุรอาน มีบัญญัติในการลงโทษมุสลิม ผู้ทำผิดประเวณี ไว้อย่างไร? และอะไรคือหลักการของศาสนาอิสลาม และ อะไรที่เป็นหลักการที่ไม่ได้มาจากอัลกุรอาน ซึ่งเป็นบัญญัติที่มาจากคัมภีร์ของยิว(โตรา)  และการลงโทษผู้ผิดประเวณีโดยการสังหารด้วยการรุมกันปา ด้วยหินจนตายนั้นมาจากการสอนของมุสลิม,  แต่ไม่ใช่การสอนตามหลักการของศาสนาอิสลาม,ที่กำหนดโทษไว้ในอัลกุรอานอย่างสมบูรณ์แล้ว

ไม่มีคำสอนใดๆในศาสนาอิสลาม,ในอัลกุรอาน ว่าผู้ที่ปฏิเสธ ฮาดีษที่เหลวไหลทำลายเกียรติของท่านรอซูลมูฮัมมัด
และขัดต่ออัลกุรอานจะตกจากศาสนาอิสลาม หรือขาดจากการเป็นมุสลิม.

      

บทความนี้แสดงให้เห็นว่า บัญัติใดๆที่มาจากฮาดีษซึ่งไม่อาจจะยกเลิก บัญญัติในอัลกุรอานได้  แม้แต่จะอ้างว่าเป็นการสอนของ
ท่านศาสนทูตมูฮัมมัดก็ตาม ทั้งนี้เนื่องจากว่า ศาสนาอิสลาม สอนให้มุสลิมยึดถือและเชื่อฟังบัญญัติของพระเจ้า/อัลลอฮ์ตะอาลาเท่านั้น
และจะต้องเชื่อฟัง การสอนของท่านศาสดามูฮัมมัดซึ่งอยู่ในขอบเขตบัญญัติในอัลกุรอานเท่านั้น

The Stoning sentence is exclusive for the Torah which law only applies to Jews:
Old testament [21.21]
And all the men of his city shall stone him with stones, so that he die. So shalt thou put evil away from among you, and all Israel shall hear and fear.

You can find it in more verses of the Old Testament: (12:10) (17:2\3\4\5\6) (21:21) (22:21\22\23\24)
God says in Quran that Quran is the new law because the Gospel and Tora were corrupted by men

[05.49]وَأَنِ احْكُمْ بَيْنَهُمْ بِمَا أَنْزَلَ اللَّهُ وَلا تَتَّبِعْ أَهْوَاءَهُمْ وَاحْذَرْهُمْ أَنْ يَفْتِنُوكَ عَنْ بَعْضِ مَا أَنْزَلَ اللَّهُ إِلَيْكَ فَإِنْ تَوَلَّوْا فَاعْلَمْ أَنَّمَا يُرِيدُ اللَّهُ أَنْ يُصِيبَهُمْ بِبَعْضِ ذُنُوبِهِمْ وَإِنَّ كَثِيرًا مِنَ النَّاسِ لَفَاسِقُونَ

[05:49]Judge thou between them by what Allah hath revealed, and follow not their vain desires, but beware of them lest they beguile thee from any of that (teaching) which Allah

So what punishment do God order when men and women committed adultery?

[24.02] الزَّانِيَةُ وَالزَّانِي فَاجْلِدُوا كُلَّ وَاحِدٍ مِنْهُمَا مِائَةَ جَلْدَةٍ وَلا تَأْخُذْكُمْ بِهِمَا رَأْفَةٌ فِي دِينِ اللَّهِ إِنْ كُنْتُمْ تُؤْمِنُونَ بِاللَّهِ وَالْيَوْمِ الآخِرِ وَلْيَشْهَدْ عَذَابَهُمَا طَائِفَةٌ مِنَ الْمُؤْمِنِينَ

[24.02]The woman and the man guilty of adultery or fornication, - flog each of them with a hundred stripes: Let not compassion move you in their case, in a matter prescribed by Allah, if ye believe in Allah and the Last Day:and let a party of the Believers witness their punishment.

“Flog each of them with a hundred stripes” is very different from “Stone them to dead”. There is nothing the Quran about stoning… Nothing, Nada.

The following text is from an article publish by Akbarally Meherally:

THERE CAN BE NO LAW ABOVE THE LAW OF THE CREATOR

The day when the prescribed penalty for the sin of adultery and fornication was revealed by Allah through His Messenger Muhammad (s.a.s.), all the past Traditions, Rulings, Examples and Directives from the Prophet and/or from all other individuals or societies do stand repealed permanently. To propagate otherwise, would be to place the “Human Law” above the “Law of Allah”, which in Islam is regarded as an unpardonable sin.

STONING TO DEATH IN THE HADITH

There are a few Muslims who do propagate, based upon a “re-reported narrative” called Hadeeth that the Second Caliph (successor to the Prophet) had said in one of his sermons that there used to be a Revealed Verse for “Death” by stoning but it has since been lost and is not to be found in “The Holy Book”.

I wish to inform these propagators that this is a fundamentally faulty narrative – Hadeeth. Here are the indisputable facts from the Islamic history to substantiate my remark.

i) The Second Caliph died in 644 CE

ii) The Revelations that came to the Prophet were collected and compiled in a book form by the Third Caliph.

iii) This final compilation of the Holy Book (al-Qur’an) was done in 651 CE (i.e. seven years after the death of the Second Caliph). In defies logic that a person could have passed such a remark for “The BOOK”, which was compiled years after his death.

iv) Even if one was to entertain the notion that the Second Caliph had indeed made such a serious statement in public concerning the Qur’an, then it could not have escaped the notice of his successor who undertook the task of compilation.

v) It is inconceivable that not a single member of the Commission, appointed for the compilation of “The Holy Book” did not hear that Sermon nor its narrative. To say that the Third Caliph and/or the Commission knew of the “Lost Verse” and yet ignored the allegations and did not include that verse is to say that they all were totally incompetent.

vi) Did Allah who had promised to Guard His Revelation (see Qur’an 41:42; 15:9 and 73: 20) failed to safeguard the “Holy Book”?

vii) The fact of the matter is that the Muslim scholars of our era have discovered that there are over 5,000 weak, spurious and fabricated hadeeth (sayings and deeds of the Prophet), in circulation that Islam “absolves today”. It is essential to note that the re-narrated narratives (hadeeth) that are in circulation today were complied more than two centuries after the passing away of the Prophet. For those individuals who had forged the narratives in the name of the Prophet, during that period of six or more generations, it was not difficult to forge narratives in the name of a Caliph. For details of these 5000 Ahadeeth that Islam absolves today, please visit http://www.mostmerciful.com/al-albaani.htm
But, please completely read this article first.

viii) There are the precise Commands of Allah for adultery and the fornication.

ix) Scholarly comments by Muslim scholars, will lay bare how the Sharia Court has REJECTED Allah’s Revealed Sublime Law.
…if anyone slew a person – unless it be for murder or for spreading mischief in the land – it would be as if he slew the whole people: and if anyone saved a life, it would be as if he saved the life of the whole people. ….. Qur’an Chapter 5, Verse 32
All translations and commentaries (unless stated), are from Abdullah Yusuf Ali’s original unedited version.
The numbering of verses may vary slightly in some other translations.

STONING TO DEATH IN SAHIH AL-BUKHARI

Below are the three narrations on the penalty of stoning, from the famous book of the Prophetic Traditions and Narrations known as Sahih Al-Bukhari:

Hadith No. 4.829: When a Jew and a Jewess who had committed the illegal sexual intercourse were brought before the Prophet (s.a.s.), he ordered them to be punished according to their Jewish laws that are recorded in the Torah. The couple was stoned to death. This Hadith was narrated by Abdullah bin Umar.

Hadith No. 8.805: A married man from the tribe of Bani Aslam who had committed illegal sexual intercourse and bore witnesses four times against himself was ordered by the Prophet (s.a.s) to be stoned to death.
This Hadith was narrated by Jabir bin Abdullah Al-Ansari.

Hadith No. 8.804: Ash Shaibani narrates that when he asked ‘Abdullah bin Abi Aufa; “Did Allah’s Apostle carry out the penalty of Rajam (i.e., stoning to death)?” He said, “Yes”. When the narrator asked; “Before the revelation of Surah-an-Nur or after it?” He replied, “I don’t know.” This Hadith is narrated by Ash Shaibani and is repeated one more time under Hadith No. 8: 824