รบกวนตรวจแกรมม่าหน่อยค่ะ เขียนๆไปชักไม่แน่ใจว่าจะมีคนอ่านรู้เรื่องเหมือนที่เราอ่าน
อ่านรู่เรื่องมั้ยคะ มีศัพท์แนะนำ คำเจ็บๆ ประโยคเด็ดๆอะไรแนะนำบ้างมั้ยคะ
a an the ตรงไหนขาด / เกิน Subject Verb agreement?
โจทย์เค้าให้เปรียบเทียบ 2 extracts
Two extracts discuss the effect of cultural globalisation in Africa from different perspectives are “Cultural Globalisation and Its Impacts in Africa” by Maputsen (2002) and “Youth Culture in Zimbabwe: Response to De-westernisation” by Maasilta (2006). Maputsen discusses largely on a negative effect of globalisation that has dominated Africa and created materialism by the consumption of global commodities. Although he concede that global commodities bring new ideas and opportunities, he argue that it undermine a sense of solidity of society Maasilta , on the other hands, focuses mainly on a positive effects of globalisation in Zimbabwe and how youth creatively response to government’s censorship policies on western contents. However, in spite of the different approaches of the above two texts, there are considerable agreements.
Both extracts concede that global culture and global commodities are excessive disseminated across Africa that local ones have no abilities to withstand (para.2). This spread attracts most of people as evidenced by Maputsen’s statement (2006) claiming that it “[means] escape from oppressive traditions (para.2)”. This attractiveness of global entertainment is also mentioned throughout in Maasilta’s extract via the way that young people try very hard to get access to global media. However, although these similarities are visible, both authors approach divergent views on the effects of globalisation.
While massilta (para.8) argues that globalisation cause destructive impacts and are problematic, Maasilta ignore a negative effect and highlight that an ineffective government restriction causes young people find the way to get access to alternative popular contents which (para.4) leads to a pathway for youth to find and express their own identities. Although he concede that some people have to spend money for accessing western broadcast, the demand of global cultural commodities increase in “informal traders’ markets (para.6)” which allow those who are disadvantaged to connect with global media without financial resources. On the other hand, Maputsen (para.3) argues that the poor are unable to experience cultural globalization by their own decisions because it has been chosen by global markets.
Maputsen further explains that cultural globalisation undermines local culture by commercialising the way of life into commodities which is valued by global market. Therefore, it discards the local values and specific needs that more suitable to local environments and circumstances. He concludes that western culture completely controls and endanger a development of social solidarity(para.6). In contrast, Maasilta claims that young people in Zimbabwe creatively react to globalisation response by reproducing the mainstream music using their own languages. As a result local and global value had been combined and create dynamic popular culture. This process does not stop a developement of local culture as Maputsen claims.
In spite of the different perspective from two extracts, they contribute a number of knowledge about the effect of cultural globalisation in Africa. Further study should more focus on a role the internet plays in cultural globalisation instead of the traditional form of madia in globalisation.
ขอบคุณมากกกกค่ะ
รบกวนตรวจแกรมม่าหน่อยค่ะ เขียนๆไปชักไม่แน่ใจว่าจะมีคนอ่านรู้เรื่องเหมือนที่เราอ่าน
อ่านรู่เรื่องมั้ยคะ มีศัพท์แนะนำ คำเจ็บๆ ประโยคเด็ดๆอะไรแนะนำบ้างมั้ยคะ
a an the ตรงไหนขาด / เกิน Subject Verb agreement?
โจทย์เค้าให้เปรียบเทียบ 2 extracts
Two extracts discuss the effect of cultural globalisation in Africa from different perspectives are “Cultural Globalisation and Its Impacts in Africa” by Maputsen (2002) and “Youth Culture in Zimbabwe: Response to De-westernisation” by Maasilta (2006). Maputsen discusses largely on a negative effect of globalisation that has dominated Africa and created materialism by the consumption of global commodities. Although he concede that global commodities bring new ideas and opportunities, he argue that it undermine a sense of solidity of society Maasilta , on the other hands, focuses mainly on a positive effects of globalisation in Zimbabwe and how youth creatively response to government’s censorship policies on western contents. However, in spite of the different approaches of the above two texts, there are considerable agreements.
Both extracts concede that global culture and global commodities are excessive disseminated across Africa that local ones have no abilities to withstand (para.2). This spread attracts most of people as evidenced by Maputsen’s statement (2006) claiming that it “[means] escape from oppressive traditions (para.2)”. This attractiveness of global entertainment is also mentioned throughout in Maasilta’s extract via the way that young people try very hard to get access to global media. However, although these similarities are visible, both authors approach divergent views on the effects of globalisation.
While massilta (para.8) argues that globalisation cause destructive impacts and are problematic, Maasilta ignore a negative effect and highlight that an ineffective government restriction causes young people find the way to get access to alternative popular contents which (para.4) leads to a pathway for youth to find and express their own identities. Although he concede that some people have to spend money for accessing western broadcast, the demand of global cultural commodities increase in “informal traders’ markets (para.6)” which allow those who are disadvantaged to connect with global media without financial resources. On the other hand, Maputsen (para.3) argues that the poor are unable to experience cultural globalization by their own decisions because it has been chosen by global markets.
Maputsen further explains that cultural globalisation undermines local culture by commercialising the way of life into commodities which is valued by global market. Therefore, it discards the local values and specific needs that more suitable to local environments and circumstances. He concludes that western culture completely controls and endanger a development of social solidarity(para.6). In contrast, Maasilta claims that young people in Zimbabwe creatively react to globalisation response by reproducing the mainstream music using their own languages. As a result local and global value had been combined and create dynamic popular culture. This process does not stop a developement of local culture as Maputsen claims.
In spite of the different perspective from two extracts, they contribute a number of knowledge about the effect of cultural globalisation in Africa. Further study should more focus on a role the internet plays in cultural globalisation instead of the traditional form of madia in globalisation.
ขอบคุณมากกกกค่ะ